Tuesday, January 5, 2016

Visit to Butler Library at Columbia University

Kevin Kudic
10/22/15
Barbara Gleason
ENGL B6400 Theories and Models of Literacy




                                             A peek into the history of books

            A book as a physical object has power attached to it. What a book represents to a society and how the content of the book is communicated is heavily influenced and controlled by larger forces at play; this question also relates to the issue of who has access to a book.
            We live in an age where books are shared, exchanged and talked about in a variety of ways. The communal power of owning a book can be sensed in a cultural titan like Oprah Winfrey setting the barometer for taste for which book to read: an Oprah seal of approval automatically grants a book status that was not there prior. Sometimes, the sociocultural forces not only decided which books to include but rather exclude as well. These forces run the gamut; from an adjudicated decision on obscenity like in the case of Ulysses, or in a classroom when a professor decides which books to include in the syllabus are all different ways in which this power struggle manifests itself.

            It was with great pleasure that I was able to step into the vault at Butler Library and get a tour of the some rare books and manuscripts at Columbia University. Walking in and seeing the books sprawled out on the table almost as if they were waiting to be autopsied gave me a curious feeling. What was more amazing was seeing how well preserved the books managed to be after half a century in some cases. Consuelo Dutschke was our guide and she is the curator at the Rare Books and Manuscripts Division. She gingerly handled the books while talking about their specific historical role or function. The handouts she distributed marked all of the books and manuscripts we would be looking at during the demo.
One of the manuscripts that interested me was the Encyclopedia. The large tome was located at the end of the table. What was particularly striking about this book and many of the other books in general was the fine, ornate style of the lettering. Wrapped in beautiful bound leather with pages made from vellum, the book was gorgeous to look at. I’ve always been fascinated with Encyclopedias, tomes and books with indexes and collections. What particularly interested me in the encyclopedia were the drawings inside of them. A different scribe would take over taking turns writing a couple of entries. This process of scribes taking turns writing entry in this encyclopedia made me draw parallels to some of the practices that are currently done in digital spaces.
            Now, when we think of encyclopedias we imagine massive collections of databases like Wikipedia where people can contribute to an entry. It is the community of Wikipedia users that check each other and make sure that each entry is accurate. The encyclopedia that we saw as a class, strangely, wasn’t very much different. Each scribe wrote different sections of the book; normally we associate encyclopedias with full color illustrations and pictures but the encyclopedia that we saw didn’t have any illustrations until a scribe started drawing something in one of the entries. Later scribes got hold of the same book and started intentionally leaving a space to accommodate a picture illustration for each entry. So from this one scribe we suddenly got pictures in the encyclopedias; this is a standard feature of encyclopedias today that wasn’t originally part of them. I found this connection to be very fascinating.
            Lately, I have been using a lot of e-books; I own a Kindle and find it immensely useful for carrying large amounts of books in a single portable device. It is hard to imagine the amount of effort and time it took to produce a single book. Current technology has made printing accessible at your fingertips and there are even services that offer custom digital book printing. The books that we saw on display took a tremendous amount of work to make. Making the vellum that scribes used instead of paper was made from goat or pigskin. Dr. Dutschke ran through the grocery list of the livestock that was required to make one book. The fact that it took all of these animal to make only one book added prestige and value that must have been quite impactful for someone to own. Not everyone could afford a book back in the Middle Ages and the person that had a book took it as a special indicator of status. Knowing this information made me appreciate how books were made and the work put into making them. It also gave insight into the way books must have been perceived in the Middle Ages, not just founts of information but also special tokens of status.
            I take the train every morning to work and what I notice that is very commonplace is people reading. Take the subway in New York City and you can see people reading on multiple devices. A large fold-able newspaper like the New York Times has largely fallen out of fashion. What has cropped up instead is the digital version of the print edition. If you peruse a full car during morning rush hour you’ll see people reading on their smartphones flipping through pages digitally with a quick flick of their thumbs. You’ll also see people with the new generation of Kindle reading e-print. Sometimes, you may even see people with laptops typing a last minute note to them, eyes glued intently on the screen. Society may lament that people aren’t reading enough, but that isn’t necessarily true when you ride the subway. In some way, especially digitally, people are interacting with text.
            If we compare this mode of reading: silent and contemplative to the way people read in the advent of the book then we can take the trajectory of the history of the book as one that goes from outward to inward in many ways. Alberto Manguel notes, “Written words from the days of the first Sumerian tablets, were meant to be pronounced out loud, since the signs carried implicit, as if it were their soul, a particular sound (The Silent Reader 45).” As the technology improved, the ability of the book to be personalized became more feasible. In its earliest incarnation, before even a physical book was well established, we had text. As Dr. Deutschke showed us during the tour, the script was written without any breaks between words, no punctuation—scripta continua.  Looking at this, made me think about how reading must have taken place during those times. I wasn’t aware that this form of writing was so prevalent. It made me think about other kinds of writing systems in the world. I realized that the way we leave a space between each word was not something that was taken for granted, but rather it developed from a specific purpose: To read silently.
Silent readers are usually the norm when we think about the act of reading. We tie the function of literacy to this ability. A literate person should be able to read silently with confidence and with ease. However the cultural norm of silent reading has been conditioned to us from a particular framework that took centuries to develop. In many ways, I think silent reading took hold from the development of people as readers.
            Centuries ago, when scribal literacy dominated the landscape, texts were read orally. The communities that were literate were typically the elites of a society. This was true during a time when the overwhelming majority of the populace could not read or write. Yet texts were circulating freely especially in the nascent Christian religion before it would dominate Europe. Scribes would work on a text and sometimes they would pick up where another scribe left off. It was a highly literate and closed feedback system. In the texts that were shown to us, one of the manuscripts had the entire Book of Psalms written in two pages. This was meant to be strictly memorized. The text sprawled across the pages and the writing was so tiny that it was hard to imagine how ancient scholars could have possibly read them. Seeing the kind of usage that books had really impressed me. From the tour, you could really sense the impact that books had on a culture that was still very much based on the oral tradition, yet here they had texts that were primarily used as a performative piece. Books were meant to be read out loud in public. Quite different from the silent reader image that we have ingrained in our society.
Overall, it was a wonderful experience visiting the Rare Books Divison. I learned that books are not simply neutral vessels of information and knowledge, but rather a benchmark for the way we view what society truly values.




















                                                                    Works Cited

Manguel, Alberto. A history of reading. Penguin, 2014. Print
McGrath, Alister. In the beginning: The story of the King James Bible and how it changed a nation, a language, and a culture. Anchor, 2008. Print

Saenger, Paul. Space between words: The origins of silent reading. Stanford University             Press, 2000. Print

No comments:

Post a Comment